State of struggle by the masses
Public.icon
/emoji/twitter.icon If we talk about how "basic human rights are established by social consensus," then it also means that "basic human rights can be abandoned at any time by social consensus." And those who don't realize this think that they are "society=themselves" and "good=themselves," so they think there is no problem. This is a typical idea of paving the way to hell with good intentions. ...They only use human rights as a convenient stick to suit their own convenience, without thinking about why human rights are considered "natural rights." They end up thinking that "social consensus" can control "human rights," which is a fallacy. Human rights cannot be established without being recognized as natural rights, can they?